NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA P104-100 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 48GB
GB VRAM NVIDIA P104 100 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 48GB)
NVIDIA P104-100 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1733MHz vs 1190MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
NVIDIA P104 100 8 GB
+264%
6.655 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 900
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
15
768
Shading Units
1920
48
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
104.0 GFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.655 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
208.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GP104
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-100-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
