NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1190MHz vs 1050MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+126%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 900
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Oland
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
