NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 107W)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 137% (2815MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
+215%
5.765 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
Radeon RX 6500 XT
+218%
571
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
2310 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
107W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Navi 24
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
