Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon X1600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon X1600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 75W)

Score

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
27W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV516
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net