Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA PG506 232

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1440MHz vs 1203MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +318%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 900
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1203 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
76.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.464 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
76.99 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
GA100
950 OEM
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy