Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 +4245%
1.825 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV610
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy