NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 11GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages

Lower TDP (90W vs 250W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1545MHz vs 1188MHz)

More VRAM (11GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (616.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 950

1.825 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti +636%

13.45 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 950

1862

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti +683%

14594

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 950

5

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti +1060%

58

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 950

20

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti +445%

109

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 950

30

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti +383%

145

GeForce GTX 950

VS

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Sep 2018

GeForce 900

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz

Base Clock

1350 MHz

1188 MHz

Boost Clock

1545 MHz

1653 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

11GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

352bit

105.8GB/s

Bandwidth

616.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

68

768

Shading Units

4352

48

TMUs

272

32

ROPs

88

-

Tensor Cores

544

-

RT Cores

68

48 KB (per SMM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

0 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

136.0 GPixel/s

57.02 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

420.2 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

26.90 TFLOPS

1.825 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

13.45 TFLOPS

57.02 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

420.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W

TDP

250W

250 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206

GPU Name

TU102

GM206-250-A1

GPU Variant

TU102-300A-K1-A1

Maxwell 2.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

2.94 billion

Transistors

18.6 billion

228 mm²

Die Size

754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

5.2

CUDA

7.5

6.4

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro V8750

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI Radeon HD 3570

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA P104 100

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI Radeon HD 3870

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro W4100

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU