NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1700MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2.46 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+41%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1176 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1201 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
76.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
2.460 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
76.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
DG2-128
GTX 960 OEM
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
