Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1201MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2.46 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +38%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1176 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1201 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
76.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.460 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
76.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Tahiti
GTX 960 OEM
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy