Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1532MHz vs 1150MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M +100%
2.355 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 965M +82%
1819
GeForce MX150
994
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
May 2017
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
GP108
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy