NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 970 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1590MHz vs 1178MHz)
Lower TDP (90W vs 148W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 970
+37%
3.92 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2014
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1050 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1664
Shading Units
896
104
TMUs
56
56
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.97 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
122.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
3.920 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
122.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
148W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU106
GM204-200-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
