Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1076MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 980 Ti +689%
6.06 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

103.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
189.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.060 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
189.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GM200-310-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy