Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1076MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 980 Ti +506%
6.06 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
800
176
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

103.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
189.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.060 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
189.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
RV770
GM200-310-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy