NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1750MHz vs 1089MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+148%
6.691 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+77%
5418
Arc A310
3061
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+75%
2632
Arc A310
1496
Blender
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+4%
543
Arc A310
521
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
DG2-128
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
