NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1189MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX130
+2241%
0.913 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2017
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce MX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1109 MHz
Base Clock
-
1189 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.512 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
28.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
-
-
-
913.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
28.54 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
11W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GT218
N16S-GTR-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
