Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel Arc A770M

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel Arc A770M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1650MHz vs 1532MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Arc A770M +1048%
13.52 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX150
988
Arc A770M +977%
10646
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
211.2 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
422.4 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.03 TFLOPS
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
DG2-512
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
120W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy