Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1532MHz vs 1250MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M +171%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Navi 14
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy