Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs Intel Arc A730M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs Intel Arc A730M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 12GB VRAM Arc A730M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 80W)
Intel Arc A730M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1100MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Arc A730M +747%
6.758 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1071
Arc A730M +626%
7786
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
Arc A730M +1838%
1396
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.758 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy