Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro M7820

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro M7820

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7820 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro M7820 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
FirePro M7820 +40%
1.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
384
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1120 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Broadway
-
GPU Variant
Broadway XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy