NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 330M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+558%
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 330M
0.121 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
GeForce GT 330M
+60%
1733
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
6
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
121.4 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N11P-GE1-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
