NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+66%
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640M
0.48 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
+223%
1079
GeForce GT 640M
334
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
+47%
222
GeForce GT 640M
151
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2012
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
32W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N13P-GS
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
