Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1455MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +3452%
28.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.0 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
442.3 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.31 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.31 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
442.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy