Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (1038MHz vs 1035MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (394.2GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5600M +564%
5.299 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
Radeon Pro 5600M +643%
535
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
394.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.24 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
331.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Navi 12
-
GPU Variant
Navi 12
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
74 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy