NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1207MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+675%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce MX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
