NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1207MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+270%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2020
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce MX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
720 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
20
896
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
52.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
3.333 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
1.667 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
52.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GA107
N18S-G5
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
