Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Intel Arc A730M

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Intel Arc A730M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps and 12GB VRAM Arc A730M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1275MHz vs 1100MHz)
Lower TDP (31W vs 80W)
Intel Arc A730M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
2.285 TFLOPS
Arc A730M +195%
6.758 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
71.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
4.570 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
2.285 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.758 TFLOPS
71.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy