Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +1475%
6.05 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.514 billion
Unknown
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy