NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
+12464%
6.659 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Mar 2010
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
34
SM Count
3
2176
Shading Units
24
136
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
8
272
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
97.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
208.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
13.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.659 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.80 GFLOPS
208.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
175W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GT216
TU106-410-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
