NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (1532MHz vs 1530MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
+465%
6.659 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
May 2017
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
34
SM Count
3
2176
Shading Units
384
136
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
272
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
97.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
208.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
13.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
6.659 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
208.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GP108
TU106-410-A1
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1
(N17S-G1-A1)
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
