NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1815MHz vs 1188MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (495.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

2304 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages

Lower TDP (90W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER +510%

11.15 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 950

1.825 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER +519%

11544

GeForce GTX 950

1862

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER +860%

48

GeForce GTX 950

5

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER +355%

91

GeForce GTX 950

20

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER +330%

129

GeForce GTX 950

30

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

VS

GeForce GTX 950

Graphics Card

Jul 2019

Release Date

Aug 2015

GeForce 20

Generation

GeForce 900

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1650 MHz

Base Clock

1024 MHz

1815 MHz

Boost Clock

1188 MHz

1937 MHz

Memory Clock

1653 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

495.9GB/s

Bandwidth

105.8GB/s

Render Config

-

48

SM Count

-

3072

Shading Units

768

192

TMUs

48

64

ROPs

32

384

Tensor Cores

-

48

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

38.02 GPixel/s

348.5 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

57.02 GTexel/s

22.30 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

11.15 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.825 TFLOPS

348.5 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W

TDP

90W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104

GPU Name

GM206

TU104-450-A1

GPU Variant

GM206-250-A1

Turing

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

13.6 billion

Transistors

2.94 billion

545 mm²

Die Size

228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

5.2

6.6

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S9170

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs AMD FireStream 9350

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU