Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +2374%
7.127 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 30
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.212 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.212 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.5 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
R600
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy