Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +21068%
6.774 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
40
72
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV610
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy