Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI FireGL V7700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI FireGL V7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +1262%
6.774 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 30
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV670
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy