Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 300

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +17269%
6.774 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 30
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GT218
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy