Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1777MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 +1249%
9.098 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 30
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1552 MHz
Base Clock
-
1777 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

56.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
142.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
9.098 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.098 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
142.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
219W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GT200B
GA107-150-A1
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy