Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 6 GB and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock990MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 6 GB +1589%
4.055 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM

Clock Speeds

622 MHz
Base Clock
-
990 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
63.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
4.055 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.055 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
63.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GF117
-
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy