NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1455MHz vs 1282MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q
+10%
9.846 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
817 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1282 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
24
3840
Shading Units
3072
120
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
120
Tensor Cores
96
30
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
61.54 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
153.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
9.846 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
9.846 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
153.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
12 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
