Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3090 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (936.2GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3090 +345%
35.58 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2020
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 30
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1219 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
936.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
82
SM Count
-
10496
Shading Units
4096
328
TMUs
256
112
ROPs
64
328
Tensor Cores
-
82
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

189.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
556.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
35.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
35.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
556.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
300W
750 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GA102-300-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy