NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4010 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4010
+553%
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.414 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Dec 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-101-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
