NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4010 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4010
2.706 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
+202%
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 40
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
