NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4010 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650
(215CCCBKB12FG)
Ampere
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
