Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W4190M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 95% (1755MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +1200%
8.986 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1455 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1755 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
140.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
8.986 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.986 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
140.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Opal
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy