Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD FirePro S9000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +319%
13.52 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy