Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +2066%
13.52 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy