NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
+1738%
22.06 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
800
136
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
RV770
AD104-150-K1-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
