NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 74% (2610MHz vs 1500MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

4864 additional rendering cores

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages

Lower TDP (230W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 +310%

44.1 TFLOPS

Radeon Pro WX 8200

10.75 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

VS

Radeon Pro WX 8200

Graphics Card

Jun 2024

Release Date

Aug 2018

GeForce 40

Generation

Radeon Pro

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2340 MHz

Base Clock

1200 MHz

2610 MHz

Boost Clock

1500 MHz

1313 MHz

Memory Clock

1000 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6X

Memory Type

HBM2

256bit

Memory Bus

2048bit

672.3GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

56

66

SM Count

-

8448

Shading Units

3584

264

TMUs

224

96

ROPs

64

264

Tensor Cores

-

66

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

48 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

250.6 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

96.00 GPixel/s

689.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

336.0 GTexel/s

44.10 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

21.50 TFLOPS

44.10 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.75 TFLOPS

689.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

285W

TDP

230W

600 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102

GPU Name

Vega 10

AD102-175-KEF-A1

GPU Variant

Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

GCN 5.0

TSMC

Foundry

GlobalFoundries

5 nm

Process Size

14 nm

76.3 billion

Transistors

12.5 billion

609 mm²

Die Size

495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

8.9

CUDA

-

6.8

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs Intel Arc A310

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 PCI

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT AGP

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon HD 7720 OEM

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU