Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (2610MHz vs 2331MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +1131%
44.1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +3581%
8136
Radeon Pro W6400
221
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +1350%
116
Radeon Pro W6400
8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +1000%
220
Radeon Pro W6400
20
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +751%
298
Radeon Pro W6400
35
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

2340 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.3GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

66
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
8448
Shading Units
768
264
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
264
Tensor Cores
-
66
RT Cores
12
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

250.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
44.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
44.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
689.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Navi 24
AD103-275-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

285W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy