Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 320W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
-
304
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

320W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
RV516
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
4 nm
Process Size
80 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy