Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
9648 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 +46765%
48.74 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
80
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

320W
TDP
19W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Cedar
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy