NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
-
304
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
320W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
RV530
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650
(215CCCBKB12FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
